지역정책연구 테스트

CRI 연구
“한국연구재단” 등재지로, 지역연구 전문 학술지로 2021년부터 년3회 발간되고 있습니다.
게시물 검색
60건의 게시물이 있습니다.
게시물 목록 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.





{게시판명} 목록 - 번호, 제목, 작성자, 작성일, 조회수, 첨부 정보 제공
번호 제목 작성자 작성일 조회수 첨부



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
60 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호 관리자 2020.05.04 3,472 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
59 [31-1] 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 관리자 2020.07.10 1,999 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
58 [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 관리자 2021.01.06 2,026 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
57 [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 관리자 2021.01.06 1,796 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
56 지역정책연구 [31-2호] 관리자 2021.01.06 4,589 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
55 [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향 관리자 2021.06.02 1,685 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
54 [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로 서브관리자 2021.09.01 1,566 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
53 [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환 서브관리자 2021.12.29 2,697 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
52 [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안 서브관리자 2021.12.29 2,147 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 422
            [wr_num] => -422
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 422
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [wr_content] => 

라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰 



이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 


이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안 


최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안 


황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제30권-제2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 3472
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:sJA/cgkmF7/VOH4fctJ4sbCwLceAWWyW:q7d6eu7rUv+1s8Z+7XcUpgfp4MJ0Onjq
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-05-04 17:17:57
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-05-04 17:20:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2019.12
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15885804403.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제30권 제2호
            [content] => <p>라휘문ㅣ중앙정부와 특례시 간 재정조정에 대한 고찰&nbsp;</p><p><br>

</p><div>이승주ㆍ박정순ㆍ안종호ㆍ박상수ㅣ지역 특성을 고려한 공동주택 주차설치기준 연구 <br><br>

이승현ㅣ충청북도의 군과 지역사회 발전을 위한 군사시설 보호구역의 협의방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>최길수ㅣ지역발전을 위한 민‧관‧군 협력체계 구축 방안&nbsp;</div><br>

<div>황세인ㆍ박정란ㅣ지역사회복지관 사례관리자의 사례관리 실천과정 수행에 관한 연구</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-05-04
            [datetime2] => 05-04
            [last] => 2020-05-04
            [last2] => 05-04
            [name] => 관리자

            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=422&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 60
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 423
            [wr_num] => -423
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 423
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [wr_content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-지방자치단체별-보통교부세의-재정형평화-기능-분석
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1999
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:ueEJdYPf0qLtgjSeho0IwqXMkRSUwD7l:40Wofe9pKZe1pOE6fc35IIDGnzeu4kNx
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:47:10
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:48:42
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1]  지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석
            [content] => 본 연구는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능을 분석하기 위해 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군으로 구분하여 보통 교부세 교부 전-후의 변이계수를 비교·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년간 보통 교부세는 특‧광역시, 도, 시, 군 간의 재정불균형을 완화하는 재정형평화 기능을 꾸준히 수행해 왔다. 특히, 시와 군에 미치는 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 매우 강하였다. 하지만, 10년간 변이계수의 증감의 폭이 작고 불규칙하여 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능이 점차 강해지고 있다고 보기는 어렵다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로, 향후에는 보통교부세가 재정형평화 기능에 더욱 충실할 수 있도록 법정 교부세율을 인상할 필요가 있고 중앙정부와 지자체의 협의를 통해 보통교부세 제도를 개선하는 과정 이 필요할 것이다. 또한, 현재 추진 중인 재정분권 방안에 보통교부세 제도를 연계하는 종합적인 접 근이 필요하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=423&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 59
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2026
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 58
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 431
            [wr_num] => -431
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 431
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.
정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.

따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.

            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-정부-간-행정관계와-차이의-정치
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1796
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:Ndyt7BZnVwjZVa4N7BfHAZEHTABtVjSn:p80iobj5ZHvI4ksV1Uqfins40mQv8IRY
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:12:34
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:36
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 중앙정부와 지방정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부별 차이를 존중하고 있는지, 즉 지방의 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 분석하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 수행하였다. 연구목적의 달성을 위하여 동화주의와 민주적 문화다원주의 관련 논의를 살펴본 후 차이를 존중하는 민주적 문화다원주의 가치를 지향하여야 정의로운 사회라는 것을 도출하였다. 이러한 논리를 정부 간 행정관계(행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양)에 적용하여 중앙정부가 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있는지를 파악하였다.<div>정부 간 행정관계에 대한 분석결과 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하고 있다고 보여지지는 않는다. 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중하지 않는다는 의미는 지방을 동질화시킨다는 의미가 된다. 지방의 동질화현상이 지속 및 확대되면 병적인 동질화로 이어질 것이다. 병적인 동질화는 중앙정부의 동질화 시도에 동화되지 못하는 지방정부를 어렵게 하고, 이는 국가경쟁력을 약화시키는 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 크다.</div>

<div>따라서 정부 간 행정관계에서 중앙정부는 지방정부의 차이와 정체성을 존중할 수 있는 방향으로 행정기구와 인력 그리고 기능이양 방향을 설계하여야 할 것이다. 구체적으로는 행정기구와 인력을 설계하는 과정에서 지방정부가 적극적으로 참여하여 의견을 개진할 수 있도록 다양한 기제를 마련하여야 하며, 중앙기능을 지방으로 이양을 할 때에는 지방의 차이와 정체성을 반영한 차등분권을 추진하기 위하여 노력하여야 한다.</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=431&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 57
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4589
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 56
        )

    [5] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 441
            [wr_num] => -441
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 441
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [wr_content] => 


 [요약] 


본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 > 투자 > 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 > 수출 >정부소비 > 민간투자 > 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.







            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-지역-소비-투자-수출이-충북-노동소득에-미치는
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1685
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:15:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 지역 소비, 투자, 수출이 충북 노동소득에 미치는 영향
            [content] => <p><b></b></p><table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 144px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>본 연구는 2020년 한국은행이 발표한 2015년 지역 산업연관표를 이용하여 지역의 소비, 투자, 수출 등 최종소비지출이 충북 노동소득에 미친 파급효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과 우리나라 지역간 소비, 투자 및 수출의 충북 노동소득 유발총액은 소비 &gt; 투자 &gt; 수출의 순으로 나타났으나 산업별로 노동소득 유발총액의 크기가 차이를 나타냈으며, 노동소득 유발액 기여도는 민간소비 &gt; 수출 &gt;정부소비 &gt; 민간투자 &gt; 정부 투자 등의 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 COVID-19와 같은 외부 요인에 의해 지역소비가 위축될 경우 충북 지역은 민간소비의 노동소득 유발 의존도가 높은 산업 부분이 타산업에 비해 큰 영향을 받을 것으로 추정할 수 있다. 충북의 소비, 투자의 노동소득 효율성을 나타내는 노동소득 유발계수는 민간보다 정부부문의 효율성이 크므로 적극적인 중앙 및 지방정부의 소비와투자 증대를 통한 경기 안정화 및 부양대책이 필요하다.</p><p><br></p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table><p><br></p>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=441&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 55
        )

    [6] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 452
            [wr_num] => -451
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 452
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [wr_content] => 

 [요약]


최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-2호-01-불균형-이론을-통한-주택시장-불안-원인
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1566
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-09-01 17:15:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.08
            [wr_4] => 01
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 김성연
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-2호] 01 불균형 이론을 통한 주택시장 불안 원인 분석 - 2017년 이후 주택시장을 중심으로
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[요약]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>최근까지 주택가격 상승에 따른 주택시장 불안이 이어지고 있다. 문제는 정부의 주택시장 안정화 대책에도 불구하고 주택시장 불안은 개선되지 않는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 불균형 이론에 근거하여 주택시장 불안 원인을 파악하고 이에 따른 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2017년 1월 이후 수도권과 광역시 내 주택매매시장을 중심으로 관련 통계, 정부 보고자료 등을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 주택시장 불안 원인은 ① 주택의 총량적 부족, ② 주택 인허가 감소에 따른 향후 주택 부족, ③ 지역별 주택공급 격차, ④ 주택소요에 부합하지 않은 주택공급 한계 등으로 확인되었으며, 분석결과를 바탕으로 정부의 제도적, 행정적 점검 사항과 주택공급을 위한 대안 등 주택시장 불안 해소를 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다.</p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-09-01
            [datetime2] => 09-01
            [last] => 2021-09-01
            [last2] => 09-01
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=452&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 54
        )

    [7] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 454
            [wr_num] => -453
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 454
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-경제개발과-지역개발을-위한-인식론적방법론적-전환
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2697
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:35:44
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 08
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 임형백
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 경제개발, 지역개발, 추격효과, 퀀텀 점프, 실패 비즈니스
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 경제개발과 지역개발을 위한 인식론적‧방법론적 전환
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>이 논문은 경제개발과 지역개발에서 인식론적 측면과 방법론적 측면에서의 전환의 필요성을 고찰하였다. 한국은 ‘추격효과’에 있어서 가장 성공적인 국가의 하나였다. 국제통화기금(IMF)의 추정치에 의하면 2021년 국가별 경제규모(명목GDP) 순위는 1위 미국, 2위 중국, 3위 일본, 4위 독일, 5위 영국, 6위 인도, 7위 프랑스, 8위 이탈리아, 9위 캐나다, 10위 대한민국, 11위 러시아이다. 그러나 여러 정부의 경제정책의 실패, 최근의 한국의 경제적 상황의 위기, 세계 2위의 경제대국 중국과 세계 3위의 경제대국 일본사이에 위치한 한국의 지정학적 위치를 고려할 때, 경제개발과 지역개발에 있어서 지금까지의 정책에 대한 재고와 전환이 필요하다. 또 일류국가로 도약하기 위하여, 첨단기술 강국이 되기 위하여는 기초과학에 대한 보다 과감한 투자도 필요하다. 단기적인 성과 창출과 안전관리 위주의 경직성에서 벗어나야 한다. 또 연구자의 자율성을 인정하고, 불필요한 행정을 간소화하여야 한다. 시류에 편승하지 않는 도전적이고 장기적인 연구에 대한 지원과 정책의 일관성 유지가 필요하다. ‘성실실패용인제도’의 적극적 활용과 실패 비즈니스가 필요하다. 한편 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하지 않을 수는 없다. 반면 수도권으로 이주하는 인구에게 주택을 공급하여 수도권에 정주하게 한다면, 인구감소 시대에 지방으로 이주할 인구는 없다. 수도권 주택공급과 국가균형발전은 상충되는 정책이다. 제로-섬 게임이고, 더구나 2020년 ‘데드 크로스’가 발생했다. 해법은 간단하다. 수도권보다 더 정주환경이 양호한 도시를 지방에 육성하는 것만이 근본적 해결책이다. 기존의 혁신도시를 장기적으로 발전시켜가는 것과 새로운 도시 또는 경제권을 육성할 것인지에 대한 심각한 논의와 결정이 병행되어야 한다. 단 이러한 도시 또는 경제권의 육성은 경제적 타당성은 없고, 정책성 타당성을 가지고 추진하는 것이다. 또 막대한 예산이 소요될 것이므로, 장기적이고 일관된 정책을 추진하여 반드시 성공시켜야 한다. 정치적 득표를 계산한 선심사업(pork barrel)으로는 절대 성공할 수 없다. 실패는 막대한 재정적 낭비와 국가적 재앙수준이 될 것이다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=454&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 53
        )

    [8] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 458
            [wr_num] => -457
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 458
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.



            [wr_seo_title] => 32-3호-도시-공업지역의-활성화를-위한-법제적-정비-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2147
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-12-29 13:48:39
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.12.
            [wr_4] => 04
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 안윤상, 최정석, 이만형
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 도시공업지역, 산업단지, 용도지역 규제, 산업 활성화, 제도 정비, 도시공업지역법
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-3호] 도시 공업지역의 활성화를 위한 법제적 정비 방안
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>산업단지를 명시적으로 제도화한 1990년 ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’이 제정되기 이전부터 국내 산업단지는 중앙과 지방정부의 다양한 정책적 지원을 받아 왔다. 이와는 대조적으로, 개별 지방자치단체에 의해 지정되어 온 도시 공업지역은 명확한 공공지원이 없이 순수하게 용도지역 규제에 의해 관리되어 왔다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그동안 지방자치단체가 산업단지를 당해지역 개발의 직접적인 수단으로 적극적으로 수용해온 반면, 노후화로 인한 각종 문제에 직면한 도시 공업지역 관리에는 상대적으로 소극적이었다. 이런 딜레마적인 상황을 개선하기 위해 이 연구는 도시 공업지역에서의 산업 활성화에 역점을 둔 일련의 법제적 정비를 살펴보는 데에 일차적인 목표를 둔다. 우선, 이 연구는 현재 공업지역과 관련한 제도적인 운영 시스템과 그 한계를 검토한다. 주요 대상은 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률,’ ‘산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률’ 및 ‘도시재생 활성화 및 지원에 관한 특별법’ 등이다. 나아가 새롭게 도입한 ‘도시 공업지역 관리 및 활성화에 관한 특별법’의 주요 내용을 비판적으로 검토한다. 이와 같은 법제도적인 정비를 통하여 이 연구는 도시 공업지역의 적정관리에 초점을 둔 실천적인 대안을 설계하는 데에 도움을 주고자 한다.<br></p><p><br></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-12-29
            [datetime2] => 12-29
            [last] => 2021-12-29
            [last2] => 12-29
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=458&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 52
        )

    [9] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 469
            [wr_num] => -468
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 469
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [wr_content] => 

 [초록]


우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의  한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는  구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.  이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.


            [wr_seo_title] => 33-1-2-농촌지역-사회적경제의-지속가능한-성장과-한계에-대한
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2398
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin1
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 서브관리자
            [wr_email] => dsyeon@cri.re.kr
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2022-06-07 18:33:29
            [wr_ip] => 122.45.22.248
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2022.05.
            [wr_4] => 02
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 최남희
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => N
            [wr_tag] => 사회적경제, 성장의 한계, 지속가능성, 시스템사고, 인과순환구조/피드백 루프
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" class="__se_tbl"><tbody><tr><td class="" style="width: 1028px; height: 110px; background-color: rgb(235, 235, 235);"><p>&nbsp;<b>[초록]</b></p><p><b><br></b></p><p>우리나라 농촌지역의 경우 사회적경제의 중요성이 점점 더 커지고 있으나 지속가능한 성장의&nbsp; 한계와 위기에 직면해 있으며, 여기에는 다수의 요인들이 상호작용하는 인과순환적 피드백구조들이 작동하고 있을 것이라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이 논문의 연구 목적은 농촌지역에 대한 관심과 정책적 맥락에서 우리나라 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장을 제약하는&nbsp; 구조적인 한계가 어떠한 인과순환적 피드백구조들에 의해 초래되는가를 규명하고, 나아가서는 이를 극복하기 위한 정책지렛대를 탐색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 이 논문에서는 시스템사고(Systems thinking)와 그에 따른 인과지도 분석기법 사용하여 개별적인 요인들의 탐색과 나열이 아닌 시스템을 구성하는 내생적 요인들의 상호작용에서 지배적인 인과순환적 피드백구조(dominant feedback structure)를 도출하고 성장의 한계 극복을 위한 정책지렛대를 도출하였다. 분석결과 농촌지역 사회적경제의 한계는 역설적으로 정부주도의 제도화에 따른 특정 사업유형으로의 동형화와 편중, 지역적 크림스키밍(cream-skimming)에 따른 쏠림, 자금지원 의존에 따른 자생력 위축, 낮은 인식수준 등이 강화되는 인과순환적 피드백구조가 작동하기 때문인 것으로 규명되었다.&nbsp; 이러한 성장의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는 인과순환적 피드백구조에 작동할 수 있는 다양한 정책지렛대로서 인증제도 전환, 성과기반의 정부지원, 지역균형 관점을 고려한 인증, 혁신역량 강화지원, 다양한 사회적 가치 실현 활동 및 소비참여, 연대와 협력활동 지원 및 홍보강화, 그리고 사람중심의 보편적 가치실현을 위한 보편적 제도로서 사회적경제기본법 합의와 제정 등을 제시하였다.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2022-06-07
            [datetime2] => 06-07
            [last] => 2022-06-07
            [last2] => 06-07
            [name] => 서브관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                    [2] => https://cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=469&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 51
        )

)
51 [33-1] 2. 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석 서브관리자 2022.06.07 2,398 파일첨부
“한국연구재단” 등재지로, 지역연구 전문 학술지로 2021년부터 년3회 발간되고 있습니다.

『지역정책연구』는 인적자원개발 및 직업능력개발 관련 전문학술지(한국연구재단 등재학술지)로서 관련 분야의 연구 활성화는 물론 연구결과나 과정 등을 신속하게 전파하여 학술적인 발전에 기여하고 있습니다. 『지역정책연구』에 게재할 우수한 논문을 수시로 공모하오니, 관심 있는 분들의 많은 응모 바랍니다.

  • 논문주제고용, 직업교육·직업훈련, 교육훈련기관 평가, 자격, 진로·직업, 직업교수학습, e-Learning 등
  • 발간일연 3회 (3월 31일, 7월 31일, 11월 30일)
  • 원고마감수시접수
  • 제출방법이메일제출
  • 문의처 Tel. 043)220-1133
원고작성요령 투고지침 연구윤리 논문샘플양식

이전호 보기

보기